a new security flaw in the subsystem that could let attackers compromise its MFS file system . Intel has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityupdates to addressVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe problem , though , so Intel CPU owners should make sure their firmware is up-to-date . ME has become a repeated source of problems for Intel and its customers . The utility is a chip-on-a-chip that allows IT managers to remotely access company PCs with tools like Intel 's Active Management Technology ( AMT ) . ME has its own network interface , memory , operating system and file system ( MFS ) that are kept separate from the main system in a bid to prevent it from allowing hackers to access ostensibly secure information . The problem is that researchers have discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitynumerous vulnerabilities in ME over the last few years ; Positive Technologies revealedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityone in 2017 that allowed full takeover of ME via USB ( it 's since been fixedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerability) . Now , it 's revealedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityanother one that allows someone with physical access to a system to compromise ME and `` manipulate the state of MFS and extract important secrets '' with the ability to `` add files , delete files and change their protection attributes . '' Positive Technologies said the attack can be used to learn four keys MFS uses to secure data -- the Intel Integrity Key , Non-Intel Integrity Key , Intel Confidentiality Key and Non-Intel Confidentiality Key -- that were supposed to be protected via a firmware update Intel releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityin 2017 . Positive Technologies explained how someone with physical access to the system could bypass that patch to compromise those keys in its blog post : `` Positive Technologies expert Dmitry Sklyarov discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityvulnerability CVE-2018-3655 , described in advisory Intel-SA-00125 . He found that Non-Intel Keys are derived from two values : the SVN and the immutable non-Intel root secret , which is unique to each platform . By using an earlier vulnerability to enable the JTAG debugger , it was possible to obtain the latter value . Knowing the immutable root secret enables calculating the values of both Non-Intel Keys even in the newer firmware version . ... Attackers could calculate the Non-Intel Integrity Key and Non-Intel Confidentiality Key for firmware that has the updated SVN value and therefore compromise the MFS security mechanisms that rely on these keys . '' Intel releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe Intel-SA-00125 firmware update to defend against this vulnerability on September 11 . But this is another point in favor of companies questioning -- or outright banning -- the use of ME in their systems . Purism avoids ME and the services it enables in its privacy-focused Librem notebooks , Google is working to remove ME from the Intel processors it uses and previous security flaws have raised concerns among consumers .
Samba has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitysecurity updates addressingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya possible avenue for DoS attacks and attackers changing administrator passwords . Samba 4 users should update now . Open source server platform Samba has issuedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitypatches for two critical vulnerabilities that could be used to launch denial-of-service attacks or allow anyone to change user and administrator passwords . Samba is a free , open source interoperability suite that extends Windows file and print services to Unix and Linux machines . Businesses that run Unix/Linux and Windows side by side frequently use Samba to link the two operating systems together , making any risk to the security and stability of Samba a serious risk . The vulnerabilities in questionVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability, CVE-2018-1050 and CVE-2018-1057 , are both serious risks for anyone using Samba . If your business has a Samba implementation it 's highly recommended that you install the applicable security updates . What the Samba vulnerabilities can do The first vulnerability , 1050 , affectsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityall Samba instances version 4.0.0 and up . More specifically , it only affectsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityversion 4.0.0 and up Samba installations that are also running their Remote Procedure Call ( RPC ) Spool Subsystem Service ( spoolss ) as an external daemon ( RPC spoolss is configured to internal by default ) . If the RPC spoolss misses an input sanitization check it can cause the print spooler to crash , effectively killing the ability for anyone using Samba to send files to a printer . The second vulnerability , 1057 , is a far greater risk to Samba security . Like 1050 , it affectsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityall Samba installations version 4.0.0 and up and allows users to change the passwords of other users , including those with admin rights . 1057 's problem stems from a problem with how Samba Active Directory domain controllers handle permission validations using the lightweight directory access protocol ( LDAP ) . `` The LDAP server incorrectly validates certain LDAP password modifications against the 'Change Password ' privilege , but then performs a password reset operation , '' Samba said . This vulnerability only affectsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitySamba installations being used as Active Directory domain controllers , so those using Samba in non-domain control roles do n't need to be concerned . If you are using Samba as an AD DC and ca n't install the security patch yet , there is a workaround Samba says you can put in place as a temporary protection measure : revoking password change permissions for `` the world '' group .
The two vulnerabilities are critical remote code execution flaws that exist inVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityAdobe Photoshop CC . Adobe hurried outVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityunscheduled patches today for two critical flaws that could enable remote code-execution in Photoshop CC . The patches impactVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitytwo memory corruption vulnerabilities in Adobe Photoshop products , including Photoshop CC 2018 ( v 19.1.6 ) and Photoshop CC 2017 ( v 18.1.6 ) , both for Windows and macOS . The release comesVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityonly a week after the company fixedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya slew of glitches last Patch Tuesday . “ Adobe has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityupdates for Photoshop CC for Windows and macOS , ” the company said in a Wednesday security bulletin . “ These updates resolveVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitycritical vulnerabilities in Photoshop CC 19.1.5 and earlier 19.x versions , as well as 18.1.5 and earlier 18.x versions . Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code-execution in the context of the current user. ” Both vulnerabilities ( CVE-2018-12810 ) and ( CVE-2018-12811 ) are critical remote code-execution flaws , according to the advisory , but further details around both flaws are not available . Kushal Arvind Shah of Fortinet ’ s FortiGuard Labs was credited with reportingVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe two flaws . Adobe said impacted users need to applyVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe fixes to the affected versions of Photoshop by updating to version 19.1.6 ( via the applications ’ update mechanism ) . Last week , Adobe releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerability11 total fixes for an array of products , including two critical patches for Acrobat and Reader for Windows and macOS . Exploitation of those two vulnerabilities could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user . Adobe said in an email that it is not aware of any exploits in the wild for the flaws . The update is a priority 3 in severity , meaning that it resolves vulnerabilities in a product that has historically not been a target for attackers , according to the company ’ s ranking system . In this case I would expect there may have been a disclosure deadline and the release did not make this month ’ s typical release cycle but needed to release before September ’ s release cycle . ”
Adobe has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya priority update to plugVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya critical security flaw in its popular Flash Player on Windows . As per an official announcement by the company , the latest patch will addressVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityissues in Adobe Flash Player 29.0.0.171 and other earlier versions . The vulnerabilities , according to Adobe , are being used by hackers to embed malicious content distributed via email . Security firm Icebrg on Thursday announcedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythat a zero-day vulnerability has led to exploitation in Adobe Flash specifically targeted towards users in the Middle East . The vulnerability ( CVE-2018-5002 ) enables attackers to execute certain actions by executing code on the victims ' computers . As per the blog post , the exploit uses a Microsoft Office document for the attack . To circumvent the fact that Adobe Flash is blocked on most browsers , the exploit involves loading Flash Player from within Microsoft Office . The flaw was reportedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby Icebrg in collaboration with Qihoo 360 Core Security . `` While this attack leveraged a zero-day exploit , individual attacker actions do not happen in isolation . There are several other behavioural aspects that can be used for detection . Any single observable might be low confidence but multiple observables clustered might be indicative of suspicious or malicious activity , '' said Icebrg staff in its blog post . Of course , this is not the first instance wherein Flash Player 's vulnerabilities have been exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability. Back in October last year , the company had issuedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya security patch to fixVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya critical leak . Users have been strongly recommended to update Adobe Flash in order to avoid any such vulnerabilities seeping into your machines . The update , however , is not a guarantee towards protection against future discrepancies . It is thus advised to enable flash on only a secondary browser that is not used majorly on the computer .
Oracle has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya critical patch update addressingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitymore than 300 vulnerabilities across several of its products – including one flaw with a CVSS 3.0 score of 10 that could allow the takeover of the company ’ s software package , Oracle GoldenGate . Of the 301 security flaws that were fixedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityin this month ’ s Oracle patch , 45 had a severity rating of 9.8 on the CVSS scale . “ Due to the threat posed by a successful attack , Oracle strongly recommends that customers applyVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityCritical Patch Update fixes as soon as possible , ” the company said in its Tuesday advisory . The highest-severity flaw ( CVE-2018-2913 ) lies inVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe Monitoring Manager component of Oracle GoldenGate , which is the company ’ s comprehensive software package that allows data to be replicated in heterogeneous data environments . According to the National Vulnerability Database , the glitch is an easily exploitable vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via the TCP protocol to compromise Oracle GoldenGate . The flaw was discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby Jacob Baines , a researcher with Tenable . “ CVE-2018-2913 is a stack buffer overflow in GoldenGate Manager , ” Baines toldVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityThreatpost . “ The Manager listens on port 7809 where it accepts GoldenGate Software Command Interface ( GGSCI ) commands . Tenable found that a remote unauthenticated attacker can trigger a stack buffer overflow by sending a GGSCI command that is longer than expected. ” The attack is not complex and a bad actor could be remote and unauthenticated . Making matters worse , an attacker could compromise other products after initially attacking GoldenGate , the advisory warned . “ While the vulnerability is in Oracle GoldenGate , attacks may significantly impact additional products , ” the note saidVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability. “ Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle GoldenGate. ” The flaw impactsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityversions 12.1.2.1.0 , 12.2.0.2.0 , and 12.3.0.1.0 in Oracle GoldenGate . Currently no working exploits for the flaw have been discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin the wild , according to the release . It should be noted that For Linux and Windows platforms , the flaw ’ s CVSS score is 9.0 because the access complexity is lower ( only rated high , not critical ) ; while for all other platforms , the CVSS score is a critical 10 . Two other flaws were also discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin Oracle GoldenGate ( CVE-2018-2912 and CVE-2018-2914 ) , with ratings of 7.5 on the CVSS scale ; those vulnerabilities weren ’ t nearly as severe . “ All of these vulnerabilities may be remotely exploitable without authentication , i.e. , may be exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityover a network without requiring user credentials . ”
Adobe has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityupdates fixingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya long list of security vulnerabilities discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin the Mac and Windows versions of Acrobat and Reader . In total , the first October update brings 85 CVEs , including 47 rated as ‘ critical ’ with the remaining 39 classified as ‘ important ’ . It ’ s too early to get much detail on the flaws but those rated critical break down as 46 allowing code execution and one allowing privilege escalation . The majority of the flaws rated important involve out-of-bounds read issues leading to information disclosure . As far as Adobe is aware , none are being actively exploited . The update you should download depends on which version you have installed : For most Windows or Mac users it ’ ll be either Acrobat DC ( the paid version ) or Acrobat Reader DC ( free ) so look for update version 2019.008.20071 . For anyone on the classic Acrobat 2017 or Acrobat Reader DC 2017 , it ’ s version 2017.011.30105 . Those on the even more classic Acrobat DC ( 2015 ) or Acrobat Reader DC ( 2015 ) it ’ s version 2015.006.30456 . Anyone who still has the old Acrobat XI or Reader XI on their computer , the last version was 11.0.23 when support for this ended a year ago . A sign of success ? There was a time when having to patchVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityso many flaws in a small suite of products from one company would have been seen as a failure . Arguably , these days , it ’ s a sign of success – researchers are devoting the time to findingVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityvulnerabilities before the bad guys do and Adobe is turning around fixes . What ’ s surprising is that despite crediting every one of them ( and it ’ s quite a list ) , the company doesn ’ t seem to have a formal bug bounty reward program other than the separate web applications program run via third party company , HackerOne . If Adobe ’ s 85 vulnerabilities sounds excessive , have some sympathy for users of the rival Foxit PDF Reader and Foxit PhantomPDF programs . Foxit last week released what appears to beVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability116 vulnerabilities of their own ( confusingly , many of which are not yet labelled with CVEsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability) . For some reason , the number of flaws being foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin Foxit ’ s programs has surged this year , reaching 183 before this September ’ s count , compared to 76 for the whole of 2017 . As for Adobe , these updates are unlikely to be the last we hear of the company this month – expect the usual flaws to be patchedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityin Adobe ’ s legacy Flash plug-in when Microsoft releasesVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityits Windows Patch Tuesday on 9 October .
Oracle has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya wide-ranging security update to addressVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitymore than 300 CVE-listed vulnerabilities in its various enterprise products . The October release covers the gamut of Oracle 's offerings , including its flagship Database , E-Business Suite , and Fusion Middleware packages . For Database , the update addressesVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya total of three flaws . Two of the vulnerabilities ( CVE-2018-3259 and CVE-2018-3299 ) can be remotely exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitywithout authentication , while the third , CVE-2018-7489 , would require the user to have a Rapid Home Provisioning account to execute and is considered by far the least severe of the three . Oracle notedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythat all three bugs only impactVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe server versions of Database , user clients are not considered to be vulnerableVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability. For Fusion Middleware , the update will include a total of 56 CVE-listed flaws , including 12 that are remotely exploitable with CVSS base scores of 9.8 , meaning an exploit would be fairly easy to pull off and offer near total control of the target machine . Of those 12 , five were for critical flaws in WebLogic Server . Java SE will getVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerability12 security fixes , with all but one being for remotely exploitable vulnerabilities in that platform . Oracle notesVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythat though the CVSS scores for the flaws are fairly high , Solaris and Linux machines running software with lower user privileges will be considered to be at a lower risk than Windows environments that typically operate with admin privileges . MySQL was the target of 38 CVE-listed bug fixes this month , through just three of those are remotely exploitable . The two most serious , CVE-2018-11776 and CVE-2018-8014 , concern remote code flaws in MySQL Enterprise Monitor . PeopleSoft will see 24 bug fixes , 21 of which can be remotely targeted and seven that would not require any user interaction . Just one of the 24 flaws was given a CVSS base score higher than 7.2. in the Oracle listing . Sun products were the subject of 19 security fixes , including two remote code execution flaws in XCP Firmware . libssh bug more like `` oh SSH… '' Once admins getVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe Oracle patches in place , they will want to take a close look at the write-up for CVE-2018-10933 , an authentication bypass for libssh that would allow an attacker to get into a target machine by sending a `` SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS '' message when it expects a `` SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST '' message . That means any miscreant can log in without a password or other credential . As you can imagine , this is a very bad thing . Fortunately , the bug does not affect OpenSSH – and thus does not affect the hugely widespread sshd and ssh tools – but rather applications , such as KDE and XMBC , that use libssh as a dependency .
Cisco patchesVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya severe flaw in switch deployment software that can be attacked with crafted messages sent to a port that 's open by default . Cisco has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitypatches for 34 vulnerabilities mostly affectingVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityits IOS and IOS XE networking software , including three critical remote code execution security bugs . Perhaps the most serious issue Cisco has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya patch for is critical bug CVE-2018-0171 affectingVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitySmart Install , a Cisco client for quickly deploying new switches for Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software . A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit a flaw in the client to reload an affected device and cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code . Embedi , the security firm that foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe flaw , initially believed it could only be exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitywithin an enterprise 's network . However , it foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitymillions of affected devices exposed on the internet . `` Because in a securely configured network , Smart Install technology participants should not be accessible through the internet . But scanning the internet has shown that this is not true , '' wrote Embedi . `` During a short scan of the internet , we detected 250,000 vulnerable devices and 8.5 million devices that have a vulnerable port open . '' Smart Install is supported by a broad range of Cisco routers and switches . The high number of devices with an open port is probably because the Smart Install client 's port TCP 4786 is open by default . This situation is overlooked by network admins , Embedi said . The company has also publishedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityproof-of-concept exploit code , so it probably will be urgent for admins to patchVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerability. An attacker can exploit the bug by sendingAttack.Phishinga crafted Smart Install message to these devices on TCP port 4786 , according to Cisco . Embedi discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe flaw last year , landing it an award at the GeekPwn conference in Hong Kong last May , and reportedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityit to Cisco in September . Cisco 's internal testing also turned upVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitya critical issue in its IOS XE software , CVE-2018-0150 , due to an undocumented user account that has a default username and password . Cisco warnsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythat an attacker could use this account to remotely connect to a device running the software . Cisco engineers also foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityCVE-2018-0151 , a remote code execution bug in the QoS subsystem of IOS and IOS XE . `` The vulnerability is due to incorrect bounds checking of certain values in packets that are destined for UDP port 18999 of an affected device . An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious packets to an affected device , '' writes Cisco . All three bugs were given a CVSS score of 9.8 out of 10 .
Cisco patchesVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya severe flaw in switch deployment software that can be attacked with crafted messages sent to a port that 's open by default . Cisco has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitypatches for 34 vulnerabilities mostly affectingVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityits IOS and IOS XE networking software , including three critical remote code execution security bugs . Perhaps the most serious issue Cisco has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya patch for is critical bug CVE-2018-0171 affectingVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitySmart Install , a Cisco client for quickly deploying new switches for Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software . A remote unauthenticated attacker can exploit a flaw in the client to reload an affected device and cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code . Embedi , the security firm that foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe flaw , initially believed it could only be exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitywithin an enterprise 's network . However , it foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitymillions of affected devices exposed on the internet . `` Because in a securely configured network , Smart Install technology participants should not be accessible through the internet . But scanning the internet has shown that this is not true , '' wrote Embedi . `` During a short scan of the internet , we detected 250,000 vulnerable devices and 8.5 million devices that have a vulnerable port open . '' Smart Install is supported by a broad range of Cisco routers and switches . The high number of devices with an open port is probably because the Smart Install client 's port TCP 4786 is open by default . This situation is overlooked by network admins , Embedi said . The company has also publishedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityproof-of-concept exploit code , so it probably will be urgent for admins to patchVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerability. An attacker can exploit the bug by sendingAttack.Phishinga crafted Smart Install message to these devices on TCP port 4786 , according to Cisco . Embedi discoveredVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythe flaw last year , landing it an award at the GeekPwn conference in Hong Kong last May , and reportedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityit to Cisco in September . Cisco 's internal testing also turned upVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitya critical issue in its IOS XE software , CVE-2018-0150 , due to an undocumented user account that has a default username and password . Cisco warnsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythat an attacker could use this account to remotely connect to a device running the software . Cisco engineers also foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityCVE-2018-0151 , a remote code execution bug in the QoS subsystem of IOS and IOS XE . `` The vulnerability is due to incorrect bounds checking of certain values in packets that are destined for UDP port 18999 of an affected device . An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious packets to an affected device , '' writes Cisco . All three bugs were given a CVSS score of 9.8 out of 10 .
Security biz Qualys has revealedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitythree vulnerabilities in a component of systemd , a system and service manager used in most major Linux distributions . Patches for the three flaws – CVE-2018-16864 , CVE-2018-16865 , and CVE-2018-16866 – should appear inVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitydistro repos soon as a result of coordinated disclosure . However , Linux distributions such as Debian remain vulnerableVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityat the moment , depending on the version you have installed . `` They 're awareVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityof the issues and they 're releasingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitypatches , '' said Jimmy Graham , director of product management at Qualys , in a phone interview with The Register . `` I do n't believe Red Hat has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityone but it should be coming shortly . '' The bugs were foundVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin systemd-journald , a part of systemd that handles the collection and storage of log data . The first two CVEs refer to memory corruption flaws while the third involves an out of bounds error that can leak data . CVE-2018-16864 can be exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityby malware running on a Linux box , or a malicious logged-in user , to crash and potentially hijack the systemd-journald system service , elevating access from user to root . CVE-2018-16865 and CVE-2018-16866 can be exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilitytogether by a local attacker to crash or hijack the root-privileged journal service . While systemd is n't universally beloved in the Linux community , Graham sees nothing unusual about the presence of the three flaws in the software . `` The noteworthiness to me is that it is very commonly found in most major distributions , '' he said . Qualys contends all systemd-based Linux distros are vulnerableVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability, though the vulnerabilities can not be exploitedVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityin SUSE Linux Enterprise 15 , openSUSE Leap 15.0 , and Fedora 28 and 29 because their user-land code is compiled with GCC 's -fstack-clash-protection option . The security biz calls it a simplified stack clash – where the size of the stack gets changed to overlap with other memory areas – because it only requires the last two steps in a four step process : Clashing the stack with another memory region , moving the stack-pointer to the stack start , jumping over the stack guard-page into another memory region , and smashing the stack or memory space . The third bug , CVE-2018-16866 , appeared inVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerabilityJune 2015 ( systemd v221 ) and , Qualys says , was fixedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityinadvertently in August 2018 . In code where the flaw still existsVulnerability-related.DiscoverVulnerability, it could allow an attacker to read out of bounds information , resulting in information leakage . `` The risk [ of these issues ] is a local privilege escalation to root , '' said Graham . `` It 's something that should still be a concern because usually attackers do n't just use one vulnerability to comprise a system . They often chain vulnerabilities together . ''
If you own a Google Pixel or Google Pixel XL , you ’ re probably wondering where your November security patch update is . Although most Google devices — including older Nexus devices — receivedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe patch at the beginning of the month as detailed below , the original Pixel lineup was left high and dry . Today , finally , the patch is here . You can wait for the OTA to hit your device , or you can use the links below to manually install . We ’ re not quite sure why this took so long , but hopefully , the December patch will be a bit more uniform . Right on schedule , Google has releasedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityAndroid ’ s October security patch . As it ’ s the first update to make its way to the Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL , it should include some bug fixes . Unfortunately , it won ’ t resolveVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe memory issues just yet . The November patch itself includes fixes for 17 security vulnerabilities . The most severe bugs included an issue in the media framework and the ability for a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code through a crafted file . Fortunately , Google doesn ’ t believe that either of these were used to harm users . The November security patch includes several bug fixes and improvements specifically for Pixel devices . As Google notes , this update should help with notification stability on Pixel 2 and Pixel 3 handsets as well as improve picture-in-picture performance on the four handsets . Sadly , the November security patch will likely be the last update pushedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityto the Pixel C , Nexus 6P , and Nexus 5X . As Google only guarantees firmware upgrades for two years after a device is released and security patches for three , the search giant is no longer obligated to support the two phone or tablet . Of course , this doesn ’ t mean that your devices are no longer usable . Even if you no longer get official support from Google , there are large developer communities that build ROMs that bringsVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe latest security patches and Android features to all of Google ’ s abandoned devices . If you don ’ t want to wait for the November security patch to make its way to your phone , you can download the latest factory image or OTA file from the links below . From there , you can either flash a fresh build to your phone or sideload the OTA update . The November security patch is also making its way to the Essential Phone . In addition to the resolved issues addressedVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityabove , this update brings support for the company ’ s Audio Adapter HD module .